The path of wine by ∴N.D.C∴

The author of this article claims to have talked with Nick about a path to produce a red oil directly from wine.

http://my.spinsite.com/IknowTheSecret/

I was wondering if anyone has tried this path before?

For those interested in making the stone via the cinnabar way this document will make an interesting addition to an alchemists library a must have for the serious Student...... click on this amazon link to the book and there will be 2 links on here 1 for the document 1 for ordering the "Great work photographed" by roger caro

The amazon link is:

http://www.amazon.com/The-Via-Cinnabaris-F-A-R-C/dp/1495447588/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1392154593&sr=8-1&keywords=frater+t.p.s


The other book is:

http://www.hermeticenterprises.com/the-entire-great-work-photographed.html


If interested in more contact me through this link my profile name on this site is drgn99991

http://alchemergy.grou.ps/signin/warn/home



Enjoy.......I do this for nicks Honor since his stone was fake a placebo if you will but this is the real deal Enjoy....


Have fun and enjoy the reading I know I have

This ^^^^^^^ is spam,as it has no relation to the topic of the thread,neither is it remotely helpful when it comes to actually doing anything.

Unless you have personally succeeded in finishing the caro method and used it to preform a transmutation, then you do not have the practical knowledge to accurately judge which paths are true or not.

I on the other hand have followed the GW path and successfully created a white stone,fermented it with silver,and ripened that white stone into a red solar sulphur. I am currently having the process tested by the Paracelsus college.

If you want to test my stone I will gladly sell you a sample, if you want to check my work I'll gladly cite my resources. If you want to whine about how I'm doing something wrong then you'd better have some reasons to support your argument. Otherwise STFU!

Nice find solarseeker. Would have to read through the document from the sage to learn how to complete it but it was cool to see.

drgn, I agree the comment does not belong in this thread, I also believe that you are not qualified to say whose, which paths are correct. The old writings say and I believe that there are many ways to the stone. If you are qualified to know which ones work and which ones don't, you have a very high learning indeed, which I don't believe you or any of us have that level. Until then, trying to tell us which paths are correct or not is unproductive.

I downloaded the original but I haven't read it yet. The copy I have is down loaded from the library of the university of California. It's kind of hard to read since it's scans of the original. The book is so old that all of the "s"es look like "f"s.